Proper Facebook Etiquette

New rules for surviving the digitally connected world

#1019 how to win with confidence

Dear Dr Hardey,

Your site and accolade came recommended via research from friends of friends who said that I should ‘encounter’ you. I wonder if you throw some illumination on whether we should be cautious of how we field invitations on Facebook, and in doing so how quickly you can win someones confidence?…

From Professor Chappell, via the most courteous email and introductory ‘poke’ I’ve ever received.

Professor Chappell, I know of your research and likewise you have also ‘come to my attention’.  I expect your Friend Request is as imminent as your charm. I look forward, in the near future, to receiving both.

What you allude to is certainly a complex situation vis-à-vis the confidence of friends of friends. I had only yesterday a call from a journalist keen to finish ‘their story’ which ‘proved’ Facebook is the number one cause of marital (and as was implied ‘extra’ marital) upset. I refute such tenuous games and complaints of ritualised nonacceptance; to the score of, I’ve Poked her, she has Poked him blah blah blah. Incidentally, I’ve never been married but (and should such a venture ever become treated as a ‘Status Update’), then I intend to be very married. To this end, then yes we should treat with degrees of caution ‘invitations’ (in your longer email you do state that these tend to be on the more flirtatious side) favoured by either a tender lady, or resilient gentleman.

How dull then that I am neither said tendered lady nor a gentleman of resilience.  I fear that I am tripping over the language of your ‘dilemma’ where it is that you inquire as to how ‘quickly‘ you may win someone’s confidence. If the ‘end game’ is for the intention to begin the brightest chapter of your life, then a good degree of upfront honesty is a refreshing, if not absolutely charming (read necessary), way forward. A good (learned-ed, as in academic and smart) friend of mine has honesty as part of his continuous repertoire. This makes him both devilishly charming, resiliently self-contained and utterly protected against any attempts to take cr*p from those who may betray his trust.

Good for him. Especially as his highest protocol for refined behaviour makes the rest of us look bad.

I suppose that such confidences are like the most ‘artful sandwich’ (favoured by moi is the french roll; fresh parsley, egg mayonnaise, watercress and a dash of cracked pepper and sea salt), by which I mean perfectly formed as a small ritual and mixing of the most perfect of ingredients. So if you are to be encountering those who are less than artful, why would you want to even try to win their confidence in the first place.

Professor, there’s a lot of faffing about on Facebook. Not made any easier by it’s recent MySpace clone-like Profile Page update. For now we as her user’s can take this in our stride, perhaps even laugh and joke about the strange phenomenon of advertising content that appears as if tagged from ‘friends’ and friends of friends.

Because Facebook acts as a public inquiry of ‘what is going on’ (and adds a nice divergence to you day) it is difficult not to advocate any degree of caution. I mean, why not live the heady rush of life in the fast lane, wind in your hair and through some spontaneity into the mix. Otherwise it all spells out as a grim play of cat on mouse.


18 January 2012 at 16:49 - Comments

#1018 Too much time playing with a new device | Timeline

Dear Mariann,

Here’s a strange occurrence for you, before Xmas a new chap had just started at my place of work. He seems affable enough but like many people these days seems more interested in playing with his device than any real conversation. Is there a way in the New Year to force him to engage with some proper standards of engagement, or am I better off writing on his Wall?

From Ms Unheard via a Poke and direct message.

Oh, yes I fully endorse your attempts to assert your authority and lay some control over someone elses life. Maybe.

It is likely that prior to Xmas your ‘affable chap’ had signed up to the new Facebook Timeline. His ‘interest in playing with his device’ (*smirks*) smacks of some, errrr, inappropriately-led obsession and his flummoxed attempts to get to grips with Facebook’s latest furniture moving activities. Have you tried the new look Facebook yourself? once you do, let alone writing on his Wall, I could not possibly recommend any poking activity as these will be hard to find. They used to sit neatly on your Home Page, now they have disappeared into the ether [to re-discover these, go to your Home Page, select apps, and scroll down. You might want to 'add' pokes to your 'favourites' which means they now be easy to find from your Home Page once again - faff, faff, faff]

I am assured by my ‘reliable’ and in-house Facebook sources that the hiding of the Poke and the public launch of the Timeline on 23rd December is to reflect changes to Privacy Settings (again) and to ‘inline’ settings. I cannot be bothered to outline all these changes in one post, but   in his August post about Simplified Sharing at zdnet can.

Where were we, oh yes the minimum requirements to gain the attention of friends and colleagues who prioritise playing rather than conversation.Perhaps your friend is simply an extension of Facebookyists – these are those individuals who do not have ‘real’ friends these days, but a catalogue of vague acquaintances who they may have once met – a meeting which Facebook helpfully displays in the new Timeline with the additional tags of ‘school’, ‘college’, ‘university’ – they have yet to have a tag for ‘pub’, perhaps because as this is all based on time, the ingredients for such vague meetings are most likely to be forgotten. Anyway, the latest shake down reflects how the term ‘friend’ is becoming a looser these days. Equally what you say you ‘do’ on Facebook is less an extension of self (who you are and what you say you are doing); and more a cataloguing by Facebook of your activities in order to sell this onto numerous commercial companies. This should not come as any surprise to you, it’s been a commercial circus since the ‘Great Day of Openness’ on 26th September 2006, when ANYONE who ‘agreed’ with the sites terms and conditions that they were over 13 years young and had a valid email address could sign up.

…Since that fateful day things have never been the same again.

Now as a result of Mark Zuckerberg’s  lifetime (so far) of collecting, cataloguing and obsessing over your friends -which would have been dismissed as a pointless ‘hobby’ or just a bit ‘creepy’ before there was Facebook, the motive of Zuckerberg’s obsession have also become our own. In short, how we immediately rate or slate our ‘friends’, or to answer Zuckerberg’s original question when Facebook was just a college network - who is ‘hot’, vs who is not?

Is Facebook a network for friends? (and then by extension a ‘subtle’ way to rate how ‘hot’ your friends really are) or a commercial obsession? and so as a means for pushing advertising and networked-SPAM to your Profile. The answer is clearly both, but the line is not easily drawn. Perhaps the best way to judge your new friend at work, and for us to judge one another is to ask yourself whether you’d both feel comfortable not only being ‘friends’, but now knowing in precise detail what, when, where, why and how you met (then fell out) as the minutiae of your activities are bundled up and sold on – if only to sell one or both of you Russian Bride services or singles holidays.


27 December 2011 at 08:56 - Comments

#1017 cheap booze and low expectations

Dear Mariann,

Help – my ex has just friended my manager and I’m worried that he will see all the photos the ex has tagged with me at Yates’s party – and such like. How do I stop this?
From Help ex! in reply to post #1016 could the DEMAND passwords as well?

Welcome to the Christmas seasonality of ‘risky’ social activity.

I’m keen to know what you were doing in Yates to be able to ‘enjoy’ the anxiety of possibly emerging photos ‘and such like’. 

Yates for those of you who do not know is where there is a blend of cheap booze and low expectations. This is the perfect for any office night out. The first thing I noticed on my night out was how toned and worked out everyone was, all the men expensively dressed in Prada and this seasons Dolce & Gabbana. Not in Jean Republic’s last years denim wet- look trousers and pleather jacket (well it is cold out), or revealing of vast quantities of flesh and tattoos, but attired in the real stuff, freshly groomed and fragrant. And if you turn an ear there are the most gentile and intellectual conversations taking place. There is never the shouting of yobbish things, falling into the gutter, asking for a Jagerbomb, or wanting for leery geezers in here. The women in particular have spectacular and very tasteful style choice. And the staff are so polite, quick on their feet and offer better service than the butler in Downton.  I don’t think I’ve ever been to a more pleasant, nay sophisticated, watering hole that offers such decorum and good behaviour from its clientele. So for those tagged pictures you have nothing to worry about.

As Friday 16th December is The night for most office dos (and don’ts) we should also leave room for the improbable situation that perhaps things can go astray in places like Yates. I for one cannot think why…

There are several actions to take:

  1. Unfriend immediately your manager. This sends out the signal that you are ‘professional’ and also safeguards against any review or promotional activity being posted to your Wall. This shall also give you the upper hand where they thought that you were ‘friends’, but now you hold the power and you are not. Paranoia should also arouse suspicion and cause them to try to refriend you, which is when you hit them with the Limited Profile option that forbids any tagging of photos without your permission and even if you do allow these once you’ve re-jigged your Privacy Settings no-one can see these anyway. Except perhaps you and your cat.
  2. Do not unfriend the ex. You will want to continue to spy on his activity and if he has been friending your managers you will also want to have surveillance on who else is in his network and what he has been saying about you. Yes this makes you look paranoid and ‘needy’ (see point no.1), but it has the added benefit that you can remind yourself of all the things that you fancied about him in the first place and now find repulsive. Any ‘block’ on his Profile will force you into the dangerous territory of forgetting that he is a complete trog.
  3. Don’t ever go to Yates. Ever. Again.
  4. Look for a new job. I hear that Job Seekers Choose Facebook as their networking tool of choice.

Finally perhaps upgrade your expectations with regard to a nice new boyfriend. One who can take you places other than Yates. I hear Wetherspoons is lovely and Nando’s have table, chairs, cutlery and special orange sauce. Plus all the celebs go there – like Justin Trousersnake. That could be so spesh.


15 December 2011 at 23:59 - Comments
Thank you
I want to wish you season’s greetings and thank you for being a role model for many of us women ...
17 December 11 at 01:14
Anonymous
Happy Christmas
25 December 11 at 08:46

#1016 could they DEMAND passwords as well?!!!!

Dear Mariann,

My U careers office has a list of companies that will ‘clean’ people’s online profiles before they do job applications. In the Daily Mail there is a story about how employers can demand your Facebook password as part of a job application. Should I pay the money for a clean out?
From Cleaner in reply to post #1015 is she calling my bluff?… Help!

Are you really at ‘U’/niversity? Your grammar is appalling.

’nuff said on that front as your Daily Mail readership explains everything. Turning to this nasty little sheet that leaves ones hands as grubby from the cheap ink, as it does its cheaper ‘stories’ I see what you mean: Employers already snoop on Facebook accounts during job applications – but could they DEMAND passwords as well?

This is the Daily Mail, we’re not even close to real world territory here. As for the appropriate codes of behaviour these got torn up and thrown away the moment my cat peed on the rest of these pages in lieu of the appropriate posh cat litter.  According to her the Mail is fair game for all kinds of piss.

As for whether you should ‘send money’ to your ‘Cleaner’, I see you got my email from FacebookCleaner99.com. I’d like to take this opportunity to confirm the transfer of £s from you to me and I can also guarantee your win on the Canadian pools too. Please also send your bank details, username and password for security purposes. Tanks.


4 December 2011 at 08:38 - Comments
tableau contemporain
hi, that's a pleasant accumulation. There is any mistakes but the primary is here.
11 December 11 at 08:15
TagMan
How do I stop mates tagging me in photos when I am pissed? Keeps happening and I don’t want ...
15 December 11 at 17:49

#1015 Is she calling my bluff?… Help!

Dear Mariann, 

I arrived and sat down for a weekly evening out involving food, drink and silly behaviour. My university tutor from Xxxxxx University was at the next table and talking loudly with a young man who was not her husband. When they got up to leave, she glanced in my direction and (I am certain) recognised me as she leaned over and kissed the man passionately on the lips – in front of everybody in the restaurant! I was not going to mention anything about her behaviour, until last night when she Friend Requested me on Facebook. Do I accept? Is this a challenge? Is she calling my bluff?… Help! 

From PostgraduateMush via a considerably longer and rather explicit email [not for this blog]

 

Mush, it is Sunday. I am meeting some very good friends of mine (and others) for high tea. After reading your email I will be sure to scant about the place before I launch myself at one of the party for a passionate embrace. Your dilemma has already then had an affect. Although the woman in your scenario cannot be I as 1. when last I looked at my left hand I am not married and 2. I like to think my dining out is suitably hidden that there is not the risk of a tutor/student indiscretion. Equally you will never get a Friend Request from I, how crass.

You have three courses of action; each of these increasingly amplify what could be a salacious situation. So let us begin: First you ignore the Friend Request and resort to a conventional student-to-tutor conduct, in case you forgot this means turning up late for tutorials, forgetting when/where your weekly lecture is and handing in your work late with a flood of alluring and equally fantastical excuses. Second, you could send your tutor a private message (without accepting her Friend Request) to ‘test the water’ and explain that you ‘do not use Facebook’ and that you ‘hope she had a nice night out the other night’. This establishes that you know that she knows, but she knows that you don’t really know. Third, you accept her Friend Request and have a good snoop around her Profile Page. Does she have fellow students as ‘friends’? what is her relationship status? can you see her holiday snaps?

…Is this all some fantastical fantasy on your behalf? Mush, I think perhaps it is. Savour the impossibility of this moment – of the very idea that Professor X w/could pursue students nearest to her, without batting an eyelid for a passionate embrace. If she really wanted to make you all flustered she’d simply fail all your essays and recommend one-on-one tutorials.

Don’t hold your breath.

 


27 November 2011 at 09:30 - Comments
Anonymous
Manky
27 November 11 at 21:03
Cleaner
My U careers office has a list of companies that will 'clean' people's online profiles before they do job applications. ...
1 December 11 at 13:11

#1014 free coupon

Dear Mariann,

Over a drink the other night my friend revealed that he has a ‘friend tidy’ on a regular basis to maintain his networks and not appear ‘unsightly’.  I take a different approach and friend as many people as I can – whether I know them or not. I wonder who has the right approach and is my friend correct to offer more ‘exclusive relations’?

From Mr Wrinkle via a Friend Request on a Friday night – quel surprise.

Mr Winkle – this is surprisingly your real name – thank you for your Friend Request. I feel neither special nor can I reject such advances or risk the wrath of your many thousands of friends. It does appear that you ‘own’ Facebook; to your credit I’ve only ever seen such friend farming since the invitation from Her Royal Maj to join her fan page. By the by Royalty has officially been on Facebook for a year now she had ‘fans rushing‘ to join her, so it’s good to know that a bit of Queeny action still gains interest – if only to say ‘hi-ho The British Monarchy’.  She has a YouTube channel and Twitter feed too doncha know.

Sorry Mr Winkle I got carried away there in the excitement of your advances.  Back to your mute point in hand; I propose that you are both right.  His more ‘exclusive’ services as you describe them appear honourable on the surface and yet I’m distracted by the slightly seedy undertone. Your own more generous efforts provide a very acceptable approach from which Mark Zuckerberg can make a lot of money from.  Well done you, you are your own social network promoter. Have you considered doing this kind of thing for a living?…

Perhaps you need only to reinvigorate your efforts to Friending that may become much more exciting (and even less selective) through the use of ‘Friend Development Services’. You could offer a (non) exclusive coupon:

FREE COUPON FOR FRIENDS OF MR WRINKLE

Assurance of FRIEND DEVELOPMENT, RESTED NERVES, and PERFECT HEALTH.

This coupon is good if used within ten days from the date of this Friend Request…

special arrangements for readers of this blog to obtain full information for free.

 


12 November 2011 at 07:14 - Comments
Anonymous
OMG me BF has friended his ex. I'm well pissed with em. Should I dump his face or ...
24 November 11 at 16:53

#1013 self-administered drunkard skirmishes

Dear Mariann
With my iPhone 4S I can use Siri to talk to my Facebook. Trouble is got drunk …. said things… Siri posted things…. lost friends

From Siri in reply to post #1011 old damp fur coat

Really? I find this strangely exhilarating.  I’m confused by your friends reaction. Surely you’ve managed to transgress all forms supposed decency to say be able to say you mean. And if, as you suggest, you (via some pose-y new technology) were just speaking your mind then they should appreciate your guidance. Surely.

I wouldn’t worry to much about ‘lost friends’ and if your err, ‘things that were said’, were so obtuse perhaps you had better worry about the ones who did not take the opportunity to break all ties. I hardly think that using technology as drunk and a little disorderly is an indication for friends to get lost, but I suppose this depends on how crass you were along the way.

If you don’t believe me just admire the Quayside mile Tyne Side on a Saturday night. There’s all kinds of self-administered drunkard skirmishes there and most end up spending the night together, so less a catalyst for lost friends, more like lost underwear.


30 October 2011 at 11:53 - Comments
I have been examinating out some of your stories and it's pretty clever stuff. I will definitely bookmark your blog.
6 December 11 at 09:16
Things i have observed in terms of laptop memory is always that there are technical specs such as SDRAM, DDR ...
16 December 11 at 15:10

#1012 a night spent tagging (not shagging) on Facebook

Dear Mariann,

I made a getting smashed at Uni group and me mates put pics. My tutor somehow found them and she says it is not appropriate and that we are all being sexist. I think she does not like men. Does she have any right to report me to the Dean?

From Shaggy in reply to post #1011 old damp fur coat

Shaggy, I do like men. However, I do also find your Group abominable, crass and wholly unpleasant.Which makes you a rather unpleasant little fiend, note not friend.

I hardly think that using your social networks to promote a lack of net-worth is wise. So you’re smashed; so what?… Well learn this young person they’ll be much to explain when you head for professional and gainful employment somewhere outside of your loins. Imagine (*shock*) if your future boss were also a woman. This could happen as we (women that is, not your potential boss) do take up just over half the world population. Given this statistic it is likely that women who are not part of your ‘getting smashed at uni’ Group might also exist and disapprove.

If you don’t believe me, try inviting your mum to join your group. And your mates mum’s.  If you look at your antics as ‘hot stuff’, then perhaps you are really on the verge of a new sexual revolution that show how stupid some men really are. Then again, perhaps you just need to separate a night on the tiles from a night spent tagging (not shagging) on Facebook.


30 October 2011 at 11:38 - Comments

#1011 old damp fur coat

Dear Mariann,

I have unfriended Adam Werritty but he keeps poking me and hanging about like an old damp fur coat. How do I get him to shove off?

From Foxy (old) in reply to post #1010 Facebook ID. It’s an ID card stupid.

I’ve had similar issues with a recurring Werritt to my fox. Compose a revenge sh*t-list and keep a tight hold of your detractors. Tighter than those friends who you may (or may not) have had on payroll or your Friend list.

Then send in the dry cleaners, or get someone new to riffle through your racks. Just remember to hide your business cards.

Nothing says ‘sunk’ or stinks like a damp fox than a paper trail.


16 October 2011 at 22:03 - Comments
Shaggy
I made a getting smashed at Uni group and me mates put pics. My tutor somehow found them and ...
28 October 11 at 16:06
Siri
With my iPhone 4S I can use Siri to talk to my Facebook. Trouble is got drunk .... said ...
30 October 11 at 09:02

#1010 Facebook ID. It’s an ID card stupid

Dear Mariann,
Facebook have filed for a trademark patent for Facebook Business Cards and a non-magnetically encoded ID Cards. What’s this?
From The Future of Facebook like 50-days in the future (and maybe TechCrunch)

Oh, so you’re surprised by this are you? More fool you. Here’s my conundrum; it is YOU who signed up to Facebook; you give away lots of personal information without any alarm or cause for concern; you send late night drunkard messages; you tag a series of images… Basically over the course of days, weeks, months – years – you give away all your stuff to Facebook for free.

Facebook starts making money. LOTs of money (or so they have us believe, but they can’t be entirely without $s given Zuckerberg’s latest endevours).

Then they (Facebook) seek to ‘re-compose’ the information that you have given them and there’s a ruffling of Privacy concerns and ID card trepidation. But, with Facebook ID a ‘real’ priority what are our other options?

The Stupidity Card, ID passport, driving license and card-to-party all in one. An intelligence card will be available some time after 2211 when Facebook’s made the populace so stupid that we forget how to identify individuals who can converse in ‘real’ life. Only the stupidity card will entitle you to a free poke. It’s also a permanent ‘be my friend’ request. Don’t scratch away the shiny embossed line on the back, otherwise there’s no other way to see how your hair looks.

The Needy Tag, Similar to electronic tags worn by felons. This fetching ankle bracelet will be endorsed by Lindsey Lohan and will contain a record of every Friend Request that has been sent, accepted and denied. For some repeat offenders a spray of mace will emit every time someone friends then immediately unfriends to have gained access to a Profile Page.

Poke License, we are already familiar with TV liscenes, from January 2012 everyone will be required to carry a license for poking at all times. This includes the addition of basic genetic and biometric information to ensure that poking only happens between two consenting individuals. And certainly not exes when an electric shock capability will prevent any misfire of a Poke.

The NewsFeedCard, NewsFeed ID only to be used for devoted and proper-interesting Facebook members, thus preventing so-called stupid or dull updates. In keeping with rulings by the Facebook Exective, services will not be denied to those without the NewsFeedCard, but you will need to prove you are worthy and buy me a cocktail.

The Like card, for when you Like.


16 October 2011 at 07:36 - Comments
Foxy (old)
I have unfiended Adam Werritty but he keeps poking me and hanging about like an old damp fur coat. How ...
16 October 11 at 21:23
Old Foxty
I have unfiended Adam Werritty but he keeps poking me and hanging about like an old damp fur coat. How ...
16 October 11 at 21:24